Amd Fx 8370 Benchmark

The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.

Amd fx 8370 benchmark. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTestbenchmark results and is updated daily. Its effective speed is which is currently only exceeded by AMD's % more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. For typical users however, the FX-70 runs at 4.0/4.3 GHz (base/turbo) and typically hits 5.0 GHz when overclocked.

Its effective speed is which is currently only exceeded by AMD's % more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money. In terms of raw single-core performance the flagship AMD FX-50 is lagging behind intel's processor line-up by over two generations. Where the AMD FX makes up is on multi-core performance, with a score of.

This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the AMD FX-70 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions. For typical users however, the FX-70 runs at 4.0/4.3 GHz (base/turbo) and typically hits 5.0 GHz when overclocked. The PassMark Single Thread scores for the i5-2500K vs the FX-50 are 1863 to 15 which shows that in terms of raw per-core processing the FX-50 is lagging the two year old i5 by 23%.

Price and performance details for the AMD FX-70E Eight-Core can be found below. The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD FX-70 is just 16.8%. If price data is available:.

For typical users however, the FX-70 runs at 4.0/4.3 GHz (base/turbo) and typically hits 5.0 GHz when overclocked. AMD FX-70 - Benchmark and Specs compare with other CPU Cinebench R (Single-Core) Cinebench R is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors.

Its effective speed is which is currently only exceeded by AMD's % more expensive FX-9590 (scoring 85), making it relatively good value for money.